24th June 2009

15 notes

Permalink

insooutso: Apology or not, I might need to see it based on the billboards alone. I never saw the movie, but read about its troubled history when it came out in 2004. I must admit I’m still curious to see it one day. Roger Ebert’s review of the final product—the version shown in theaters—gives a pretty good account of what happened.

insooutso:

Apology or not, I might need to see it based on the billboards alone.

I never saw the movie, but read about its troubled history when it came out in 2004. I must admit I’m still curious to see it one day. Roger Ebert’s review of the final product—the version shown in theaters—gives a pretty good account of what happened.

Reblogged from So in, so out...
  1. superdoofus-stratodrive reblogged this from moderation and added:
    i’ve seen this film twice. it’s self-indulgent and trite and i remember seeing far more interesting sophmore-year...
  2. moderation reblogged this from spdracerx and added:
    people can’t think outside the box. This film, yet very flawed, is very beautiful in its approche to its “hulking,...
  3. spdracerx reblogged this from yhf and added:
    PLEASE nobody watch this movie. I suffered through it for my first Netflix Self-Torture Experiment, but there’s no...
  4. yhf reblogged this from kolchak and added:
    Are we talking about Vincent Gallo, or Nick? Either way, I’ll pass.
  5. rafitorres reblogged this from insooutso and added:
    never saw the movie, but read about its troubled history when it came out in 2004. I must admit I’m still curious
  6. insooutso posted this